Category: Communications

  • IPOs worth $100B are anticipated in India’s tech sector by 2027

    IPOs worth $100B are anticipated in India’s tech sector by 2027

    More than three dozen tech startups with a combined valuation of $100 billion are set to go public by 2027 in what would mark a rebound in stock sales in India, according to one of the country’s top deal advisers to internet companies.

    Walmart Inc.-controlled online retailer Flipkart, payments firm PhonePe and lodging provider Oyo Hotels are among the companies seeking to list in the country, which was the world’s second-largest market for share sales last year but has lost steam since. Most companies preparing for an initial public offering have been able to strike a balance between speedy growth and profitability, according to a report by the homegrown investment bank The Rainmaker Group.

    Young companies are now in better shape than in 2021 and 2022, when several startups that sought to capture India’s booming capital markets cratered after listing at high valuations, said Kashyap Chanchani, managing partner at Rainmaker. Payment provider Paytm has dropped about 63% since its IPO while beauty retailer Nykaa is down 4%.

    “The financial health of the startups due to list in the next two years is materially better than the companies that listed previously,” Chanchani, who helped Indian startups raise $1 billion in equity last year, said in an interview. “Two-thirds of these firms are already profitable, and they are also doing a better job with transparency.”

    Rainmaker’s clients have included Oyo and e-commerce startup Swiggy, and the firm typically receives a cut of the fundraising deals it helps to arrange. It doesn’t advise companies on IPOs.

    The number of share sales in India dropped by 34% in the first quarter as the stock market sputtered. The benchmark NSE Nifty 50 Index had risen for nine consecutive years, but it started declining in late September amid an unexpected slowdown in economic growth and a slew of analysts downgraded their expectations for corporate earnings.

    First-quarter proceeds from IPOs, block sales and share placements in India nearly halved to $7.1 billion, slipping below those of Hong Kong and Japan.

    Still, Chanchani is among bankers predicting that deals in India will pick up in the coming months, when several sales are expected to hit the market. Those include LG Electronics Inc.’s Indian unit, which may raise as much as $1.7 billion, and electric-scooter maker Ather Energy Pvt., which could raise about $400 million.

    A new surge in startup IPOs would provide a much-needed exit to large investors such as SoftBank Group Corp. and Prosus NV. Billionaire Masayoshi Son’s SoftBank Vision Fund is a shareholder in companies such as Oyo, optician Lenskart Solutions Pvt., and used-car seller CARS24 Solutions Pvt., while Prosus is an investor in e-commerce firm Meesho and home services startup Urban Company.

    Firms like SoftBank and Prosus “have a dozen companies or so where they are sitting on massive gains, and several of these firms have begun seeking the public markets route,” Chanchani said, cautioning though that IPOs will have to be priced carefully as retail investors will reject lofty valuations.

    Companies going public will have to assuage investor concerns about a slowing economy and earnings growth. Some of India’s newly listed stocks have also declined after sales restrictions expired, adding pressure to a stock market already down hundreds of billions of dollars since late last year.

    India’s startup economy remains among the biggest in the world after the US and China. Still, it’s also one that’s seen major corporate governance lapses, sinking valuations and profits turning to dust. Many young firms have been forced to cut jobs and growth plans, while others have imploded. Teacher-turned-entrepreneur Byju Raveendran’s eponymous online tutoring business illustrates how a once high-flying company can run aground as investors lose faith in founders once-labeled charismatic.

    “One of the key questions that investors ask us often is — can we trust the founders?” Chanchani said. Bloomberg

  • Spending on cloud infrastructure is still growing

    Spending on cloud infrastructure is still growing

    According to the International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Quarterly Enterprise Infrastructure Tracker: Buyer and Cloud Deployment, spending on compute and storage infrastructure products for cloud deployments, including dedicated and shared IT environments, increased 99.3% year-over-year in the fourth quarter of 2024 (4Q24) to $67.0 billion. Spending on cloud infrastructure continues to outgrow the non-cloud segment with the latter growing by 25.8% in 4Q24 to $22.0 billion. The cloud infrastructure segment experienced double digit growth unit demand of 33.5%, with a continued increase in ASPs mostly related to the accelerated increase of GPU server shipments.

    “Cloud infrastructure spending growth continued outpacing market expectations again in the fourth quarter,” said Juan Pablo Seminara, director for IDC’s Worldwide Enterprise Infrastructure Trackers. “Even after raising some doubts about the necessity of large investments in AI infrastructure exposed by DeepSeek’s R1 initial impact that later proven been not that accurate, the industry is also understanding that the evolution from simple chatbots to reasoning models to agentic AI will require several orders of magnitude more processing capacity, especially for inferencing. So even by gaining efficiency on investments costs, IDC expects cloud infrastructure market growth of 17.8% CAGR for the following five years.”

    Spending on shared cloud infrastructure reached $57.0 billion in the fourth quarter of 2024, increasing 124.4% compared to a year ago. The shared cloud infrastructure category continues capturing the largest share of spending compared to dedicated deployments and non-cloud spending, in 4Q24 shared cloud accounted for 64.0% of the total infrastructure spending. The dedicated cloud infrastructure segment grew 21.8% year-over-year in 4Q24 to $10.0 billion.

    For 2025, IDC is forecasting cloud infrastructure spending to grow 33.3% compared to 2024 to $271.5 billion. Non-cloud infrastructure is expected to decline -4.9% to $68.1 billion. Shared cloud infrastructure is expected to grow 25.7% year over year to $213.7 billion for the full year, spending on dedicated cloud infrastructure expected to grow further in 2025 with 71.8% to $57.8 billion for the full year. Additionally, the cloud infrastructure GPU based accelerated market will show a 46.8% growth in 2025, reaching $157.8 billion value as AI infrastructure investments still count with an important backlog as well as future projects in the cloud.

    IDC’s service provider category includes cloud service providers, digital service providers, communications service providers, hyperscaler, and managed service providers. In 4Q24, service providers as a group spent $65.6 billion on compute and storage infrastructure, up 103.9% from the prior year. This spending accounted for 73.8% of the total market. Non-service providers (e.g., enterprises, government, etc.) also increased their spending to $23.3 billion growing 23.5% year over year. IDC expects compute and storage spending by service providers to reach $262.1 billion in 2025, growing at 30.9% year-over-year.

    On a geographic basis, year-over-year spending on cloud infrastructure in 4Q24 showed very positive results across all regions where the fastest growing regions were Canada and USA showing triple digit growth of 151.8% and 125.3% respectively, regions with double digit growth were China, Japan, APeJC, Western Europe, Middle East & Africa and Latin America with 99.6%, 76.2%, 48.0%, 36.8%, 28.1% and 14.3% respectively. While Central & Eastern Europe was the only region showing one digit growth at 5.6%.

    Long term, IDC predicts spending on cloud infrastructure to have a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.8% over the 2024-2029 forecast period, reaching $461.9 billion in 2029 and accounting for 83.0% of total compute and storage infrastructure spend. Shared cloud infrastructure spending will account for 80.5% of the total cloud spending in 2029, growing at a 16.9% CAGR and reaching $371.7 billion. Spending on dedicated cloud infrastructure will grow at a CAGR of 21.8% to $90.3 billion by 2029. Spending on non-cloud infrastructure will also rebound with a 5.7% CAGR, reaching $94.4 billion in 2029. Spending by service providers on compute and storage infrastructure is expected to grow at a 17.5% CAGR, reaching $448.0 billion in 2029. IDC

  • Spending on cloud infrastructure is still expanding

    Spending on cloud infrastructure is still expanding

    According to the International Data Corporation (IDC) Worldwide Quarterly Enterprise Infrastructure Tracker: Buyer and Cloud Deployment, spending on compute and storage infrastructure products for cloud deployments, including dedicated and shared IT environments, increased 99.3% year-over-year in the fourth quarter of 2024 (4Q24) to $67.0 billion. Spending on cloud infrastructure continues to outgrow the non-cloud segment with the latter growing by 25.8% in 4Q24 to $22.0 billion. The cloud infrastructure segment experienced double digit growth unit demand of 33.5%, with a continued increase in ASPs mostly related to the accelerated increase of GPU server shipments.

    “Cloud infrastructure spending growth continued outpacing market expectations again in the fourth quarter,” said Juan Pablo Seminara, director for IDC’s Worldwide Enterprise Infrastructure Trackers. “Even after raising some doubts about the necessity of large investments in AI infrastructure exposed by DeepSeek’s R1 initial impact that later proven been not that accurate, the industry is also understanding that the evolution from simple chatbots to reasoning models to agentic AI will require several orders of magnitude more processing capacity, especially for inferencing. So even by gaining efficiency on investments costs, IDC expects cloud infrastructure market growth of 17.8% CAGR for the following five years.”

    Spending on shared cloud infrastructure reached $57.0 billion in the fourth quarter of 2024, increasing 124.4% compared to a year ago. The shared cloud infrastructure category continues capturing the largest share of spending compared to dedicated deployments and non-cloud spending, in 4Q24 shared cloud accounted for 64.0% of the total infrastructure spending. The dedicated cloud infrastructure segment grew 21.8% year-over-year in 4Q24 to $10.0 billion.

    For 2025, IDC is forecasting cloud infrastructure spending to grow 33.3% compared to 2024 to $271.5 billion. Non-cloud infrastructure is expected to decline -4.9% to $68.1 billion. Shared cloud infrastructure is expected to grow 25.7% year over year to $213.7 billion for the full year, spending on dedicated cloud infrastructure expected to grow further in 2025 with 71.8% to $57.8 billion for the full year. Additionally, the cloud infrastructure GPU based accelerated market will show a 46.8% growth in 2025, reaching $157.8 billion value as AI infrastructure investments still count with an important backlog as well as future projects in the cloud.

    IDC’s service provider category includes cloud service providers, digital service providers, communications service providers, hyperscaler, and managed service providers. In 4Q24, service providers as a group spent $65.6 billion on compute and storage infrastructure, up 103.9% from the prior year. This spending accounted for 73.8% of the total market. Non-service providers (e.g., enterprises, government, etc.) also increased their spending to $23.3 billion growing 23.5% year over year. IDC expects compute and storage spending by service providers to reach $262.1 billion in 2025, growing at 30.9% year-over-year.

    On a geographic basis, year-over-year spending on cloud infrastructure in 4Q24 showed very positive results across all regions where the fastest growing regions were Canada and USA showing triple digit growth of 151.8% and 125.3% respectively, regions with double digit growth were China, Japan, APeJC, Western Europe, Middle East & Africa and Latin America with 99.6%, 76.2%, 48.0%, 36.8%, 28.1% and 14.3% respectively. While Central & Eastern Europe was the only region showing one digit growth at 5.6%.

    Long term, IDC predicts spending on cloud infrastructure to have a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.8% over the 2024-2029 forecast period, reaching $461.9 billion in 2029 and accounting for 83.0% of total compute and storage infrastructure spend. Shared cloud infrastructure spending will account for 80.5% of the total cloud spending in 2029, growing at a 16.9% CAGR and reaching $371.7 billion. Spending on dedicated cloud infrastructure will grow at a CAGR of 21.8% to $90.3 billion by 2029. Spending on non-cloud infrastructure will also rebound with a 5.7% CAGR, reaching $94.4 billion in 2029. Spending by service providers on compute and storage infrastructure is expected to grow at a 17.5% CAGR, reaching $448.0 billion in 2029. IDC

  • In 2024, Valve Platform would 11.5M active users

    In 2024, Valve Platform would 11.5M active users

    Steam has cemented its dominance in Southeast Asia’s booming PC gaming market, according to Omdia’s new South-Eastern Asia Online Gaming Report – 2025 report. In 2024, the Valve-owned platform set a new regional record, reaching an average of 11.5 million yearly active users (YAUs), representing 3.7% of global YAUs. While Steam faces challenges, its strategic focus on local payment gateways and region-specific pricing continues to make it the platform of choice for local developers looking to expand their global footprint.

    Mobile gaming: Football titles lead amid stagnant growth
    Despite just 2% growth in 2024, Konami’s efootball and EA FC Mobile Soccer emerged as standout performers. Fueled by major football events, strategic updates and high-profile IP collaborations, these titles drove a 39% surge in sports games revenue, solidifying their position in the mobile gaming segment.

    Policy Shifts: Government push esports while balancing regulation
    Southeast Asian governments are actively fostering gaming ecosystems through esports-friendly policies including infrastructure development, talent cultivation and IP protection. However, regulatory challenges persist, with some countries maintaining restrictions on foreign games and companies to protect local developers and younger audiences.

    A dynamic future for Southeast Asia’s gaming market
    Omdia’s latest report highlights a dynamic landscape where Steam’s PC ecosystem, the rise of sports games and government-backed esports initiatives are reshaping Southeast Asia’s gaming future.

    “Southeast Asia remains a key battleground for developers”, said Chenyu Cui, Senior Analyst at Omdia. “While the market presents immense growth potential, success depends on adapting to shifting regulations, leveraging local partnerships and aligning with regional gaming trends.” Omdia

  • Telecom Italia’s major shareholder has been Poste Italiane

    Telecom Italia’s major shareholder has been Poste Italiane

    After a decade under French control, Telecom Italia SpA now has an Italian state-backed group as its top investor — and it’s one that wants to foster mergers and acquisitions in the telecoms market.

    Postal service Poste Italiane SpA this weekend became the phone company’s biggest shareholder with a holding of nearly 25%, after purchasing the majority of a stake held by French media conglomerate Vivendi SE. Poste says the deal will support industry consolidation.

    It’s a shape-shifting moment for a troubled carrier that was privatized nearly 30 years ago, and it comes at a time when governments from the US to Europe are taking a more active role in corporate affairs.

    It also comes as Iliad SA is seeking to shake up the Italian sector through M&A, possibly by combining its local unit with Telecom Italia.

    Government oversight could offer some advantages to Telecom Italia, which Rome views as a core national asset given the volume of sensitive data it handles and the strategic importance of its digital infrastructure.

    Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s right-wing government has kept a close eye on companies it considers “national champions,” and her administration has seen Poste as a natural fit for Telecom Italia.

    Still, whether state-backed Poste can succeed where private investors failed remains an open question. Telecom Italia has been a chronic underperformer for years, hobbled by a growing debt pile that forced the firm to last year sell off its landline network, its most valuable asset, in a deal valued at as much as €22 billion ($23.8 billion).

    Italy has one of the world’s most competitive telecoms markets, already largely in the hands of foreign players. Domestic competitors include Swisscom AG’s Fastweb — which last year bought Vodafone Group Plc’s local unit — and CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd.’s Wind Tre SpA. Vivendi retains a 2.5% stake in Telecom Italia.

    The company’s legacy as a former monopoly operator crippled it from the start through a complex mix of high labor costs and ever-higher investments. Partnering with Poste Italiane could breathe new life into Telecom Italia, possibly even giving it a chance to be a player in the next wave of sector moves. Bloomberg

  • BSNL owes IMC ₹3.35 crore

    BSNL owes IMC ₹3.35 crore

    With the current fiscal year nearing an end, the Indore Municipal Corporation (IMC) has collected Rs 3.35 crore from the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) as dues. This contribution is part of a larger effort by various government departments to clear their outstanding dues and support urban development initiatives.

    IMC Revenue in-charge Niranjan Chouhan said the municipal body has been actively working to ensure that property tax and other dues are deposited. These contributions are a crucial part of this revenue collection drive, helping the IMC work on essential infrastructure and public services.

    Some government institutions, including the police departments and the CPWD, have yet to clear their outstanding dues despite repeated communications from the municipal corporation, said IMC officials. They said the IMC’s proactive approach in tax collection will contribute significantly to the city’s infrastructural growth, ensuring better facilities and services for residents. Free Press Journal

  • For Starlink, access to India may open up new markets

    For Starlink, access to India may open up new markets

    As Starlink nears regulatory approval in India for satellite broadband services, analysts say a victory there could pave a road into more emerging markets and boost the company’s ambitions to add a million subscribers every year.

    There are still legal hurdles to overcome, and competition from companies such as Eutelsat and China’s SpaceSail, which is entering Brazil, Malaysia and Kazakhstan. SpaceX also argues that U.S. regulations put it at a disadvantage against foreign rivals.

    But a foothold in India would be a potential $25 billion boon for Starlink, helping it reshape that country’s satellite broadband industry and making an attractive case to other developing markets, experts say.

    “Starlink securing the contract serves both as a strategic PR victory and a demonstration that it has successfully navigated challenges that seemed insurmountable for most other operators. From Starlink’s perspective, India is not only a credibility boost but also a crucial test of its economic feasibility in emerging markets,” said independent satcom specialist Davis Mathew Kuriakose.

    Elon Musk’s SpaceX-owned satellite internet network has been waiting since 2022 for licenses to operate commercially in India, locked in a regulatory impasse over spectrum allocation. Starlink did not respond to an email seeking comment.

    The standoff saw Starlink clash publicly with Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Jio and Sunil Mittal’s Bharti Airtel over whether India should auction satellite broadband spectrum – favouring existing telecom players – or allocate it administratively, which would benefit newer entrants such as Starlink.

    India decided in October it would allocate the bandwidth.

    In a surprise development this month, Mittal’s Airtel and Ambani’s Jio signed separate agreements with SpaceX to bring Starlink services to India, a move industry insiders say signals that regulatory hurdles may soon clear.

    Goldman Sachs forecasts that low Earth orbit (LEO) subscription fees, which include broadband and mobile services, will get dramatically cheaper, with prices dropping from $148 per month in 2023 to about $16 per month by 2035. Goldman also estimates the global satellite market will surge from $15 billion to at least $108 billion by 2035.

    Space-focused financial firm Quilty Space projects Starlink will add 3 million subscribers globally in 2025, with 1 million coming from Asia, its director of research Caleb Henry said.

    “India will be the biggest contributor to Starlink’s Asia subscriber growth once authorized,” Henry said.

    A seat at the table
    Six industry experts interviewed by Reuters noted that SpaceX’s revenue gains in India will depend on its pricing strategy.

    Three of them expect Starlink to offer competitive broadband plans, potentially starting at $15 a month — a price point designed to challenge India’s existing market, where basic plans start at about $12.

    “There’s always going to be a subset of the market willing to pay a premium for convenience. India is an aspirational market, and the brand value of having a Starlink connection is also an added edge,” said Vivek Prasad, principal analyst for space and satellite at consulting firm Analysys Mason.

    Starlink operates in more than 120 markets with varying levels of regulatory complexity, including spectrum coordination requirements.

    The company’s deals with Reliance and Airtel need final regulatory clearances but were signed just weeks after Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Musk in Washington — an interaction that analysts say may have helped smooth the way.

    Approval in India would give Starlink a leg up on any rivals hoping to enter that country, said three industry executives who declined to be named because of business sensitivities.

    “India’s satellite internet market is just coming up, with a potential addressable market of some 700 million customers. Starlink gets a seat at the table to influence how that market develops,” said one senior executive.

    India’s space regulator and the department of telecoms did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment on Starlink’s license approval.

    The SatCom Industry Association – India said Starlink’s entry would foster growth in the sector.

    “This will fuel employment growth in satellite network operations, ground stations, equipment manufacturing, and rural broadband services, while enhancing the global competitiveness of Indian space startups collaborating with international players,” the industry body said. Reuters

  • Sky is restructuring and preparing layoffs, put 2,000 UK jobs at risk

    Sky is restructuring and preparing layoffs, put 2,000 UK jobs at risk

    The British-based Sky broadcasting group said on Thursday that 2,000 jobs in the UK, or seven percent of its workforce, could be at risk as the company shakes up its customer services.

    “We’re transforming our business to deliver quicker, simpler, and more digital customer service,” a spokesperson for the US-owned broadcaster told AFP.

    It was about building “a future-ready Sky”, the spokesperson said, adding customers wanted different ways of contacting the company 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

    Three of its 10 contact centres in northern England are believed to be closing, putting around 2,000 roles at risk.

    While customers wanted to be able to speak directly to an adviser, they also wanted the flexibility to pay bills or manage their contract digitally, the company said.

    Sky said its transformation would involve a multi-million-pound investment in its new state-of-the-art campus in Livingston, Scotland.

    Formerly owned by media baron Rupert Murdoch, Sky has been run by US cable giant Comcast since 2018.

    In addition to the proposed closure of the Stockport, Sheffield and Leeds Central contact centres, operations at Dunfermline and Newcastle would also be affected. AFP

  • Elon Musk’s Starlink isn’t approved by the broadband fund nominee

    Elon Musk’s Starlink isn’t approved by the broadband fund nominee

    The Trump administration’s nominee to oversee a $42 billion government fund to bring high-speed broadband internet to unserved or underserved parts of the United States denied on Thursday that she would administer the program to benefit Starlink owner Elon Musk.

    Democrats have suggested that Musk, a billionaire and close adviser to President Donald Trump, could receive as much as $20 billion of the funding by eliminating the program’s preference for fiber and boosting satellite service.

    Arielle Roth, who has been nominated to head the Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration, said at a Senate hearing that she will “administer the program to the benefit of the American people, not any single individual or company.”

    U.S. Senator Ed Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts, noted that the law gave preference to fiber because it was cheaper. “I strongly urge you to oppose this giveaway to Elon Musk,” Markey said.

    Republicans have criticized the program because it was approved in 2021 and has yet to connect any Americans to the internet.

    Markey said the program does not exclude satellite service but limits it to areas where fiber is excessively expensive.

    Senate Committee chair Ted Cruz, a Republican from Texas, suggested the Biden administration had blacklisted Musk for political reasons.

    To date, three states have received approval of their final proposal, four states have completed their selection of internet service providers, and 30 states are in the midst of running application rounds.

    Democrats note that the Trump administration has not moved state programs forward in the process since retaking the White House in January.

    Earlier this month, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the department has launched a review of the program “to take a tech-neutral approach that is rigorously driven by outcomes, so states can provide internet access for the lowest cost.” Reuters

  • EU Commission aims to minimize tech regulation overlap

    EU Commission aims to minimize tech regulation overlap

    The European Commission is looking at ways to cut overlap in tech rules in response to complaints from business about the flood of new EU regulations in recent years, digital chief Henna Virkkunen said.

    Outside a meeting in Amsterdam, Virkkunen told reporters she had no plans to water down laws such as the Digital Services Act which governs content moderation, the Digital Markets Act, which governs big tech platforms, or the AI Act which applies risk-based rules to artificial intelligence, as part of a review of the rules.

    “Everybody who is doing business in Europe has to respect our rules here. European companies, but also American and Chinese,” she said.

    The European Union has been at the forefront of regulating technology, drawing criticism from U.S. President Donald Trump because dominant U.S. big tech firms are often targeted, and from European businesses that say over-regulation stifling innovation.

    Virkkunen said the commission is looking at ways to make life easier for companies.

    “We will look at all our digital rules … often it’s the same company who has to comply with the different rules, ” she said.

    “It’s possible that we are amending some parts of them where we see that there are, for example, overlapping parts, and we are also looking at how we can cut red tape and bureaucracy, especially for example, reporting obligations,” she said.

    She also said she favors enforcement of existing rules evenly across EU countries above pursuing further new directives governing tech.

    The commission earlier this month delayed adopting new climate change targets and sustainability rules following complaints that over-regulation is reducing EU competitiveness versus U.S. and Chinese rivals. Reuters