Category: Medical

  • China’s low-cost imports ruined the US health care areas

    China’s low-cost imports ruined the US health care areas

    Few domestic industries have been as devastated by the flood of cheap Chinese imports as manufacturers of face masks, exam gloves and other disposable medical gear that protects health care workers from infectious pathogens.

    The industry’s demise had calamitous consequences during the Covid pandemic, when Beijing halted exports and American hospital workers found themselves at the mercy of a deadly airborne virus that quickly filled the nation’s emergency rooms and morgues.

    But as President Trump unveiled his tariff regimen earlier this month, and Beijing retaliated with an 84 percent tax on American imports, the few remaining companies that make protective gear in the United States felt mostly unease.

    “I’m pretty freaked out,” said Lloyd Armbrust, the chief executive of Armbrust American, a pandemic-era startup that produces N95 respirator masks at a factory in Texas. “On one hand, this is the kind of medicine we need if we really are going to become independent of China. On the other hand, this is not responsible industrial policy.”

    The United States once dominated the field of personal protective equipment, or P.P.E. The virus-filtering N95 mask and the disposable nitrile glove are American inventions, but China now produces more than 90 percent of the medical gear worn by American health care workers.

    Despite bipartisan vows to end the nation’s dependency on foreign medical products — and to shore up the dozens of domestic manufacturers that sprang up during the pandemic — federal agencies have resumed their reliance on inexpensive Chinese imports. Industry experts say the country’s renewed dependence on imported medical products is especially concerning given an expanding measles outbreak, the threat of avian flu and a trade war with China that some worry could affect global supply chains.

    “It’s the same movie again and again,” said Mike Bowen, whose company, Prestige Ameritech, was one of the few domestic mask makers before the pandemic, and who repeatedly warned Congress about the risks of relying on foreign-made P.P.E.

    Mr. Bowen, who retired four years ago but maintains a stake in Prestige Ameritech, said the rise and fall of the American P.P.E. sector over the past few years was entirely predictable. “We didn’t learn a thing,” he said.

    Shocked by the images of nurses donning trash bags, John Bielamowicz, a commercial real estate broker in Texas, opened a N95 factory near Fort Worth with a friend, spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on machinery that would eventually churn out 1.2 million masks a month.

    “It just seemed like the right thing to do,” said Mr. Bielamowicz, whose company, United States Mask, was one of more than 100 start-ups that sprung up during the first terrifying year of the pandemic.

    Five years later, United States Mask and most of the other start-ups are gone. The companies were hit hard by slowing demand for P.P.E. as the pandemic retreated and as masks became a symbol of government overreach and loss of freedom for many Americans. But the death blow was seemingly preordained: the return of Chinese-made gear.

    Only five of the 107 companies created during the pandemic are still making masks and gloves, according to a review of the membership list created by the American Medical Manufacturers Association.

    Eric Axel, the association’s executive director, said the tariffs on Chinese-made protective gear, if they remained high, would give American producers a leg up. “I think it will change behavior, because people will have to adjust to the reality that you can’t buy below-market price rate stuff from China anymore,” he said.

    But other industry executives worry the escalating retaliatory moves by the United States and China could lead to supply chain disruptions and a return of P.P.E. shortages. Many say the economic uncertainty prompted by Mr. Trump’s tariff rollout will chill new investment.

    “It’s difficult to make business decisions when policies change every four years, and now every couple of days,” said Scott McGurl, a health care industry expert at the consultancy firm Grant Thornton.

    Given the ability of Chinese manufacturers, with support from their own government, to circumvent trade restrictions, many executives are unconvinced the tariffs will have a lasting impact. What’s needed, they say, are legislative and policy mandates that push government agencies and hospital networks to buy American-made masks and gloves.

    “Even with a 100 percent tariff, the Chinese mask that sells for a penny is still going to be cheaper than the American-made one that sells for eight cents,” Mr. Armbrust said.

    The silver-lining story about how altruistic entrepreneurialism rallied to meet a grave public health emergency wasn’t supposed to end this way.

    Political leaders from both sides of the aisle had vowed to never again to allow the nation to become reliant on foreign-made medical gear, and the Defense Department spent $1.3 billion helping American companies make N95 respirator masks and nitrile exam gloves in the United States.

    In 2021, Congress drafted legislation to ensure that federal agencies prioritized the purchase of domestically made medical equipment to sustain the sector through the inevitable peaks and troughs of demand.

    It is a model long embraced by the Pentagon, which spends hundreds of billions of dollars each year on contracts that sustain defense-related companies during times of war and peace.

    But the P.P.E. measure, folded into the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021, contained loopholes that experts say rendered it ineffective as federal agencies sought waivers to buy less expensive imports.

    When Mr. Axel of the medical manufacturer’s association recently traveled through John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, he was flabbergasted to discover that the masks used at a federal health screening station were made in China.

    “Our national security is at risk because we’ve once again put ourselves at the mercy of adversarial, nondemocratic countries,” he said.

    Mr. Trump has not mentioned personal protective equipment since returning to office, but during his first term he often spoke about the need to wean the country off foreign-made medical gear as part of his “America first” economic policy.

    “Never again will another president inherit empty shelves,” he said in May 2020, speaking at a Pennsylvania mask facility operated by Owens & Minor. “My goal is to produce everything America needs for ourselves and then export to the world.”

    Experts say the tariffs that Mr. Trump imposed on Chinese goods during his first term did little to level the playing field, mostly because Beijing’s generous industrial policy helped Chinese companies maintain their price advantage.

    The Trump administration did not respond to requests for comment.

    For now, the vast majority of masks purchased by hospital chains, federal agencies and state governments are imported, mostly from China, and to a lesser extent, from Thailand, Vietnam and Mexico — countries that often repackage Chinese-made products to avoid the tariffs that were imposed on Beijing by the last two administrations.

    Owens & Minor, the health care logistics company that Mr. Trump singled out for praise during the pandemic, sells masks that are assembled in Mexico. The company declined to discuss its production.

    There are a few exceptions to the narrative. SafeSource Direct, one of the few companies that makes nitrile exam gloves in the United States, has been surviving, largely because of a partnership with the hospital network Ochsner Health, which buys a steady stream of them, according to Justin Hollingsworth, the chief executive of SafeSource Direct. Ochsner said its investment in SafeSource was intended to ensure its hospitals and clinics have a reliable source of medical supplies.

    Armbrust American, the other pandemic-era startup still in business, gets by on purchases from travelers who don’t trust Chinese-made masks, and on bulk purchases by the retailer Target. Mr. Armbrust said Target executives were willing to pay 50 percent more for his masks and gloves because they saw the value in having a high-quality product made on U.S. soil.

    Like most Americans, Dan Izhaky, a former wholesale distribution executive in New York, wasn’t familiar with the acronym P.P.E. when friends of his began complaining about waning supplies of masks and exam gloves at hospitals where they worked.

    Six months later, United Safety Technology, the company he created to make P.P.E., won a $96 million federal contract to build a nitrile glove factory outside Baltimore.

    The company moved quickly to outfit a massive 700,000-square-foot warehouse with machinery to produce 200 million gloves a month, but as pandemic-related supply chain issues led to spiraling costs for steel beams, computer chips and shipping containers, the company needed an additional $50 million to finish the project.

    Federal officials were unmoved, he said.

    “One or two long-term government purchase contracts would have gotten us over the finish line, but the team at H.H.S. just wasn’t interested anymore,” he said, referring to the Department of Health and Human Services.

    And by the time federal officials pulled the plug, Chinese-made nitrile gloves were becoming plentiful again — and charging 1.3 cents a glove, about half what the company was planning to charge.

    Still, Mr. Izhaky said he was cautiously optimistic Mr. Trump’s tariffs. “Things are going on the right trajectory,” he said on Friday. “I just wish they were a little bit less chaotic.”

    Andrew Jacobs is a Times reporter focused on how healthcare policy, politics and corporate interests affect people’s lives. NY Times

  • A contract for telehealth will be inked by Tripura & SGPGIMS, Lucknow

    A contract for telehealth will be inked by Tripura & SGPGIMS, Lucknow

    The Tripura government will sign an MoU with Lucknow-based Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), a move aimed at ensuring telemedicine services across nine specialty departments.

    Speaking on the matter, Tripura Health Secretary Kiran Gitte said, “The Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, will sign an MoU with the Tripura government to offer telemedicine services across nine specialty departments. They will provide advice and guidance to us.”

    He also informed that around 3,000 surgeries were conducted at GB Pant Hospital between January 1 and April 12, which means approximately 40 surgeries are being performed daily. Currently, around 250 surgeries are pending. “We have sufficient doctors and surgeons,” he said.

    Gitte further stated, “Last August, we began work on the Super Specialty building, but more equipment is necessary. The Medical Superintendent (MS) of GB Pant Hospital has submitted a proposal for a CATH Lab, for which Rs 13 crore has been sanctioned by the Finance Department. Additionally, a proposal worth Rs 56 crore has been sent to the Government of India for acquiring high-end equipment and diagnostic facilities to reduce the number of referral cases. We are also planning to bring in more super speciality doctors from outside the state. Moreover, we are opening a separate Stroke Ward for patients affected by stroke.”

    He added, “From April, biometric attendance will be made compulsory for doctors, and salaries will be linked to their attendance. Based on their in and out timings and physical presence, salaries will be disbursed.”

    Meanwhile, Dr. Shankar Chakraborty, Medical Superintendent of GB Pant Hospital informed that, in the general surgery department, 147 major surgeries and 569 minor surgeries were conducted in January. In February, 264 major and 421 minor surgeries were performed, and in March, 287 major and 435 minor surgeries were carried out.

    The government-run Govind Ballabh Pant (GBP) Hospital has achieved a significant milestone, completing over 3,000 surgeries over the past 100 days with assistance from state government. The hospital boasts a team of highly skilled super-speciality doctors across all departments.

    During a recent review meeting, hospital authorities discussed the wide range of surgeries being conducted, the departments involved, the challenges encountered, and strategic measures being adopted to overcome them. IndiaTodayNE

  • AIIMS, Jammu starts the Center for Advanced Genomics lab operation

    AIIMS, Jammu starts the Center for Advanced Genomics lab operation

    To mark a new era in affordable, precision-driven cancer care for patients across India, the All-India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Jammu on Friday announced the initiation of laboratory operations at the newly inaugurated state-of-the-art “Centre for Advanced Genomics and Precision Medicine”.

    As per the official communiqué, the Centre was inaugurated by Executive Director and CEO, AIIMS Jammu Prof. (Dr.) Shakti Kumar Gupta along with Dean Research and Medical Superintendent Lt Gen Dr Sunil Kant, Dean (Academics) Prof Dr Meeta Gupta; Associate Dean (Research) Prof Dr. Shabab L Angurana, Registrar Shailender Slathia; Dr Poonam Sharma, Head, Department of Pathology; and Dr Sudarshan, Vice President – Global Operations at 4baseCare.

    The Centre, established in collaboration with 4baseCare, is equipped with cutting-edge Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technology, read the handout. UNI

  • AB PMJAY enrollment at key medical centers in Delhi

    AB PMJAY enrollment at key medical centers in Delhi

    The Delhi government is gearing up to implement the Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (AB PMJAY) and is onboarding large corporate hospitals to help reach the Centre’s free health insurance scheme to more than 654,000 families.

    However, big corporate hospitals have raised concerns over delayed payments and low package rates.

    The National Health Authority, which is the implementing agency for the scheme is training state health authority officials and doctors on the scheme’s modalities.

    The Delhi government has allocated ₹2,144 crore for PMJAY, which is the world’s largest health assurance scheme, benefiting the poor as well as over-70s.

    “NHA informed that it has started handholding Delhi government to implement the scheme. It has started the training of the State Health Authority, sensitizing hospitals, officials etc to onboard the scheme,” said an official familiar with the matter requesting anonymity.

    The official said the Delhi government is aware of the concerns raised by private hospitals and discussions are on.

    Dr Girdhar Gyani, Director General, Association of Healthcare Providers said, “Delhi government had earlier had its own scheme. The government had earlier issued an order that all those empaneled with the Delhi government schemes are deemed to be empaneled unless they certify that they are not interested. Those bigger hospitals who are not part of the Delhi government scheme had a meeting a few days back to discuss the key concerns regarding the scheme implementation.”

    “The main issue is that hospitals are concerned about timely release of funds within one month. We have to understand that treatment package rates are low and if cash flow is not good, it would be difficult for them. Private hospitals are planning to meet the Delhi government to discuss the matter,” he said.

    Major private hospital chains are not fully participating in the Ayushman Bharat scheme, primarily due to the inadequate pricing structure. The scheme’s reimbursements fail to cover the genuine costs incurred by large hospitals, and these rates have not been adjusted for inflation, said on the corporate hospitals requesting anonymity.

    Dr Narin Sehgal, Sehgal, Medical Director, Sehgal Neo Hospital and Secretary Delhi Chapter AHPI said the basic problem with PMJAY is payments to the hospitals are very low.

    “The smaller hospitals will be able to take the PMJAY willingly, but bigger corporate have been urging to modify the rates. PMJAY is very good scheme. But, hospitals like Max, Fortis and Apollo may consider the scheme if government consider their requests. We are in touch with the Delhi government to discuss PMJAY implementation in the city,” Dr Sehgal.

    Scheme implementation
    Notably, Delhi has become the 35th state/UT to implement the PMJAY scheme. It is estimated that around three million poor and another 600,000 senior citizens will be the eligible beneficiaries, making a total about 3.6 million people in Delhi.

    A senior Delhi government official aware of the matter said there is no shortage of funds and the government is in continuous talks with the bigger hospitals to onboard them on PMJAY.

    “We have held several meetings with the big corporate hospitals to discuss the scheme implementation. We are listening to their concerns and we are hopeful that we will join us,” the official said.

    “At Apollo, we believe that access to quality healthcare is a fundamental right, not a privilege. We recognise the transformative potential of Ayushman Bharat Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana PM-JAY that aligns with the Government of India’s vision of healthcare for all. We will be able to offer advanced clinical expertise including procedures such as organ transplants, complex cardiac surgeries, and specialized oncology care for children under the scheme. Our focus will continue to maintain the highest standards of clinical excellence while ensuring sustainable, impactful delivery of advanced healthcare to everyone,” said an Apollo Hospital spokesperson.

    A representative of Apollo Hospital said they are awaiting directions from the Delhi government.

    Queries sent to the Delhi government, health ministry, Max Hospital and Fortis spokesperson remained unanswered at press time. LiveMint

  • To erase medical debt, the Vermont House uses a bill

    To erase medical debt, the Vermont House uses a bill

    Thousands of Vermonters could see their medical debt wiped away under a bill headed to the governor’s desk.

    The legislation, S. 27, would use $1 million in funds appropriated to the Treasurer’s Office to erase $100 million in Vermonters’ medical debt. It would also prohibit credit reporting agencies from taking into account Vermonters’ medical debt when determining their credit scores.

    “With medical debt, it often happens to you when you have no control,” Vermont Treasurer Mike Pieciak, who has spearheaded the proposal, told lawmakers this month. “You don’t have the ability to say, ‘I’m going to delay this care or delay this treatment.’ You don’t have the ability to shop around. You’re being taken by ambulance to a hospital and the procedure’s happening to you.”

    The bill leverages the fact that medical debt can be purchased for pennies on the dollar — roughly one penny per dollar of debt, in fact. Thus, a $1 million investment could erase about $100 million of debt.

    Pieciak estimated that the legislation could eliminate medical debt for about 60,000 Vermonters.

    The $1 million investment would come out of $20 million in general funds appropriated to the Treasurer’s Office to pay off bonds before their maturation date. According to the Joint Fiscal Office, if that $1 million was used for its initial purpose, the state could have saved about $50,000 in interest.

    The legislation has received unanimous support from both chambers of Vermont’s General Assembly. The bill passed the Senate last month, and House lawmakers voted it out Tuesday.

    The bill, now poised to become law, would place Vermont among roughly 20 states and cities that have used public funds to eliminate residents’ medical debts.

    To wipe away Vermonters’ health care debts, the bill directs the state to partner with a nonprofit, Undue Medical Debt, which would work with health care providers to purchase the debt.

    It’s not clear whether all hospitals or health care providers would sign up to participate. But Devon Green, a lobbyist for the Vermont Association of Hospitals and Health Systems, said earlier this year that her organization supports the bill “wholeheartedly.”

    Vermont’s program would prioritize people whose debts are older than 18 months old. The debts must be considered uncollectible by health care providers, and the individuals must fulfill one of the following criteria: Either their debt must be 5% of a household’s annual income, or the individuals or households have income at or below 400% of the federal poverty level — currently, $60,240 for a single person or $124,800 for a family of four.

    Residents would not need to apply to have their debt canceled and would be enrolled automatically and notified if their debt is erased.

    Mike Fisher, Vermont’s chief health care advocate, told lawmakers this month that the bill was an important step forward in helping Vermonters find relief from health care debt.

    “We think whenever anybody brings concerns about medical debt and advances the conversation about medical debt in the public, that’s a good thing,” Fisher said. “So we appreciate the Treasurer’s Office for bringing this forward.” VTDigger

  • USD 127B will be the global market for portable medical devices

    USD 127B will be the global market for portable medical devices

    The global market for portable medical devices is anticipated to record a CAGR of 9.8% during the 2024-2030 analysis period and stand at a projected USD 127 billion by 2030 from an estimated USD 72.5 billion in 2024.

    This global report on Portable Medical Devices analyzes the market based on product, application, and end-users. In addition to providing profiles of major companies operating in this space, the latest corporate and industrial developments have been covered to offer a clear panorama of how and where the market is progressing.

    Many of these devices can connect with smartphones and other mobile gadgets, enhancing remote patient monitoring functions. This integration supports proactive health management and contributes to reducing the need for hospitalizations and associated healthcare expenses. The importance of portable medical devices is especially evident during global health emergencies, as they relieve pressure on healthcare systems by enabling efficient remote monitoring and care.

    The portable medical devices market is primarily driven by the growing incidence of chronic illnesses that require effective management solutions. These conditions require continuous monitoring and treatment, leading to a strong demand for portable devices that enable individuals to track and manage their health in real-time from home. The increasing adoption of advanced wearable devices also significantly boosts market growth. These devices, such as smartwatches and health monitors, offer improved data accuracy and enhance patient engagement, making health monitoring easier and more convenient.

    Moreover, the rising emphasis on home healthcare solutions, fueled by an aging population and demographic shifts, fosters the need for portable devices that facilitate remote monitoring. Technological advancements, especially the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT), have further improved the functionality and efficiency of these devices. Additionally, government initiatives promoting preventive healthcare and enhancing access to health monitoring solutions aid market expansion.

    Portable medical devices regional market analysis
    North America leads the global market for portable medical devices, capturing 40.4% market share in 2024 due to its advanced healthcare systems, high consumer demand, and an increasing occurrence of chronic illnesses. The increasing elderly population and the rise in telehealth usage, supportive regulatory and reimbursement frameworks further contribute to market expansion.

    In contrast, the Asia-Pacific region is expected to witness rapid growth with a CAGR of 11.2% during the forecast period 2024-2030, driven by an increasing geriatric population, rising disposable incomes, and growing health awareness, especially in emerging countries such as China and India. The focus on local production and innovation in cost-effective portable medical devices boosts market dynamics in this region, positioning it as the fastest-growing segment worldwide.

    Portable medical devices market analysis by product
    The portable medical devices market is segmented into monitoring devices, diagnostic imaging devices, therapeutic devices, and smart wearable medical devices. Among these, the monitoring devices segment is the largest, holding an estimated 48.5% share in 2024. This dominance is driven by increased adoption, regulatory approvals, and technological advancements that enhance portability and compactness.

    An aging population and rising prevalence of chronic diseases, which increase the demand for continuous health monitoring, support this segment’s leading position. Conversely, the smart wearable medical devices segment is projected to record the fastest CAGR of 12.2% from 2024 to 2030, spurred by growing consumer interest in fitness and health-tracking solutions. Increasing health awareness, a focus on preventive care, and advanced, innovative devices that meet consumer demand are boosting this growth.

    Portable medical devices market analysis by application
    The market for portable medical devices is segmented into cardiology, gynecology, orthopedics, gastrointestinal, respiratory, urology, neurology, and other applications. The cardiology application is expected to hold the largest market share at 29.8% in 2024, fueled by technological advancements that improve the diagnosis and management of heart conditions.

    Medical devices like Holter monitors and ECG machines enable remote monitoring, particularly for elderly people needing ongoing heart health management. The increasing prevalence of obesity and health problems related to lifestyle further strengthens the need for continuous cardiac monitoring, as cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of illness and death.

    Conversely, the gynecology application is projected to experience significant growth with a CAGR of 11.4% during the analysis period 2024-2030, driven by the rising adoption of imaging technologies and portable monitoring solutions. The rising incidence of gynecological issues and a higher rate of births contribute to the increasing necessity for advanced portable devices in this field, boosting improved outcomes and lowering the rates of congenital abnormalities.

    Portable medical devices market analysis by end-user
    The portable medical devices market is segmented into hospitals and clinics, physicians’ offices, home care settings, and other end-users. The hospitals and clinics end-user segment led the market cornering with an estimated share of 45.7% in 2024, driven by the increased accessibility and flexibility of portable medical devices. These devices reduce issues such as crowded hospital environments and staffing shortages by streamlining workflows, facilitating point-of-care diagnostics, and supporting mobile monitoring, which aids in discharging patients sooner.

    Conversely, the homecare segment is anticipated to record the fastest CAGR of 11% during the forecast period as healthcare systems focus more on home-based care. Portable medical devices like glucometers and blood pressure monitors enable patients with chronic conditions to manage their health easily, resulting in better health outcomes and reduced regular hospital visits. Research and Markets

  • The leader in uterus transplant surgery is India

    The leader in uterus transplant surgery is India

    There have been major advancements in the field of reproductive health. Besides adopting either IVF (in vitro fertilisation) or ICSI (intracytoplasmic sperm injection), the lesser-known womb transplant is offering new hope to women who have an absent or a dysfunctional uterus.

    Recently, a baby girl made headlines for being the first child born in the UK from womb transplant, whose mother, Grace Davidson, underwent the surgery. The mother’s sister donated her womb during an 8-hour transplant surgery in 2023 and this led to an “astonishing” medical breakthrough.

    While Davidson’s surgery in the UK was funded by Womb Transplant UK, India had already performed its first successful womb transplant back in 2017.

    India’s first uterus transplants
    India has also been at the forefront of uterine transplant surgery. In May 2017, surgeons at Galaxy Care Hospital in Pune made headlines by performing the country’s first and second womb transplants on two consecutive days.

    The first uterus transplant in India was performed on a 21-year-old woman who was born without a womb.

    Doctors transplanted her mother’s uterus using a minimally invasive laparoscopic technique for most of the procedure, followed by a small surgical incision to complete the organ transfer.

    This approach reduced blood loss and ensured a smoother recovery for the donor, who underwent hysterectomy.

    Soon after, a second transplant was carried out on a 24-year-old woman from Baroda. Her 45-year-old mother donated the uterus. Both donor-recipient pairs recovered well following the surgeries, led by Dr. Shailesh Puntambekar.

    In October 2018, India welcomed its first baby born from a transplanted uterus, a healthy infant weighing 1.45 kg, delivered via Caesarean section at the same hospital.

    A study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), reported a one-year graft survival rate of 74%, with 58% of recipients delivering live-born children in the US.

    This means that about 74% of uterus transplants remain functional (i.e., the transplanted uterus continues to survive and work properly) for at least one year after the surgery.

    In other words, nearly 3 out of 4 women who undergo a uterus transplant have a successful procedure where the transplanted organ is not rejected by the body, has normal blood flow, and is healthy enough to support menstruation and potential pregnancy.

    More than half of the women who undergo the procedure go on to deliver full-term, healthy babies. Importantly, no congenital abnormalities have been reported among children born through this method.

    A successful uterine transplant can be a great boon, doctors agree.

    Can it tackle rising infertility in India?
    Womb transplants are rare and complex procedures, with strict medical criteria for both donors and recipients.

    Globally, the first successful womb transplant that resulted in a live birth took place in Sweden in 2014. India followed suit in 2017, and the first successful birth was reported 17 months later.

    “These procedures are still in the experimental phase and not performed widely. Only a handful of specialised hospitals in India, such as Galaxy Care, have attempted them,” said Dr. Isha Wadhawan, Consultant Obstetrics & Gynaecology at Fortis Faridabad.

    It is an emerging treatment for a rare type of infertility known as uterine factor infertility, which affects approximately 3–5% of women worldwide.

    “These are women born without a uterus, those with a malformed uterus, a severely damaged uterine lining, or those who have had their uterus removed in the past,” said Shilpa Singhal, Consultant at Birla Fertility & IVF Dwarka.

    Women who want to donate their uterus must meet certain health requirements.

    They should be between 30 and 50 years old, healthy, and not obese (BMI under 30). They also shouldn’t have diabetes, HIV, hepatitis B or C, or any sexually transmitted diseases, according to Penn Medicine.

    If they’ve had cancer or been treated for it in the past five years, they can’t be donors.

    Uterus transplants must only be done by specially trained gynecologic transplant surgeons. After the surgery, the woman needs time to fully heal before trying to get pregnant, usually about six months of recovery is recommended.

    In India, the procedure is regulated under the NOTTO (National Organ & Tissue Transplant Organisation) Act. It is highly complex and requires both the donor and recipient to meet strict health criteria, such as a healthy BMI, no history of hypertension, diabetes, viral infections, substance abuse, smoking or alcoholism.

    “Post-transplant, women are prescribed medication for at least a year and also throughout pregnancy to ensure optimal uterine health. Deliveries post-uterine transplant are typically via C-section,” added Dr. Singhal.

    Who can donate and what does it cost?
    Uterus donors can either be living or deceased.

    Living donors are often close relatives, like mothers or sisters, offering their uterus for altruistic reasons. The process involves a complex surgical procedure where the donor’s uterus is carefully removed and transplanted into the recipient.

    For living donors, recovery time is important as it carries typical surgical risks.

    “In the case of deceased donors, organs are recovered in accordance with organ donation protocols. Proper consent and ethical considerations are paramount, ensuring that donors or their families are fully aware of the implications and risks,” said Dr. Wadhawan.

    The cost of a uterus transplant in India ranges between Rs 10 lakh and Rs 25 lakh, covering surgery, hospitalisation, and post-operative care.

    Because it is still an experimental treatment, insurance coverage is limited.

    What lies ahead
    While successful uterus transplants and births are still rare, they offer a new path to motherhood for women with uterine infertility.

    Both Indian and international cases show that with the right expertise and continued research, this treatment could become more accessible in the future. India Today

  • Gurugram’s civil surgeon serves Medanta Hospital a show-cause notice

    Gurugram’s civil surgeon serves Medanta Hospital a show-cause notice

    The Gurugram Civil Surgeon, Dr Alka Singh, has issued a show-cause notice to the Medical Director of Medanta Hospital and asked for a reply within five working days.

    Haryana Health and Family Welfare Minister Arti Singh Rao had taken strong cognisance in the sexual assault case of West Bengal air hostess at the hospital.

    As per Section 6 of the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) (CEA) Act, confidentiality, human dignity and privacy have to be observed during treatment. Under Section 7, the presence of a female person must be ensured by a male doctor during physical examination of a female patient.

    “In this case, both the clauses have been violated by the establishment. Through the notice, it is directed to Medanta Hospital to submit its reply within five working days under Section 40 of the CEA Act (2010)”, the notice said.

    The air hostess, who was admitted to the hospital on April 5, was allegedly assaulted while on a ventilator in the ICU. She had claimed that two nurses were present in the room, but did nothing to stop the incident. The Tribune

  • The trade war with China will impact US healthcare

    The trade war with China will impact US healthcare

    As the United States and China engage in a trade war driven by steep tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump and counter levies by President Xi Xinping, one sector that could be deeply impacted – and in turn have a disproportionate impact on the health of Americans – is pharmaceuticals.

    The US imports 75 percent of its essential medicines. The Trump administration has begun its investigation into imports of medications and the active ingredients needed to make them, saying a lack of that in the US poses a national security threat. It as also threatened sectoral tariffs – that could range from 7.5 percent to 100 percent – in addition to the 145 percent currently in place on China.

    While pharmaceuticals have been exempt from Trump’s reciprocal tariffs thus far, it’s not clear how long that will last, especially with potential sectoral levies in the pipeline.

    In the immediate term, there is some insulation between the looming escalated prices and what consumers will pay when they go to pick up their medication at their local pharmacy.

    Unlike other goods, pharmaceutical prices for consumers are not subject to the same instantaneous market fluctuations. The complex supply chain across the pharmaceutical industry means that there is a lag between tariffs and the impact they might have on patients.

    At the same time, there are stockpiles at nearly every step of the supply chain. Wholesalers have their own, as do pharmaceutical giants and even the federal government.

    “A lot of these medications, especially ones that are, like, in pill forms, are pretty stable for a long time,” Bruce Y Lee, professor of health policy at the CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, told Al Jazeera.

    In the short term, pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers can eat the spike in costs like they did during the Covid-19 pandemic. That gives pharmaceutical companies and trade groups time to plead with the administration to ensure exceptions from the tariffs continue.

    India supplies about half of all generic drugs used in the US. However, it depends on China for 80 percent of its active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), the chemical compounds medications are made from.

    One of the globe’s biggest pharmaceutical giants said it worries any tariff would drive up prices and hurt patient care.

    In a shareholder meeting, Michel Demare, chairman of the board for AstraZeneca, said, “We still strongly believe that medicines should be exempted from any kind of tariffs because, at the end, it is just harming patients’ health systems and restricting health equity.”

    AstraZeneca did not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for further remarks.

    Eli Lilly and Johnson and Johnson echoed similar concerns. In the last six months, all three companies have pledged multibillion-dollar investments to ramp up manufacturing as well as research and development in the US.

    But pharma giants will be able to bite the cost only for so long. Falling stock prices for pharma giants mean that they will need to find other ways to raise the stock price to meet their fiduciary responsibilities to shareholders. Experts say they can do that by renegotiating drug prices higher, depending on the medication. That causes a downstream effect that will lead to higher insurance premiums across the board and higher prices for Americans who rely on these drugs daily.

    “Demand for many pharmaceuticals is not flexible. This is not a consumer good,” Lee pointed out. “When you impose something that increases the cost, like the tariff, you can’t really change the demand … and will ultimately hurt patients”.

    A socioeconomic divide
    According to a report from the supply chain analytics company Exiger released last week, the US relies on China for as much as 80 percent of active pharmaceutical ingredients. For generic antibiotics, in particular, the dependence is much higher at 90 percent.

    Because China disproportionately produces more generic drugs, which are 80 to 85 percent cheaper than their brand-name alternatives, tariffs on China will hurt low-income communities the hardest.

    “If there’s a place where you save money, it is generic, and that’s exactly where the increases will be. Generic companies work on the slimmest margins, and they’re just not in a position to absorb [that],” Michael Abrams, partner at Numerof and Associates, a global healthcare consulting firm, told Al Jazeera.

    Recent analysis from the financial services company ING found that even a 25 percent pharma tariff could force cancer patients to pay as much as $2,000 more for a 24-week supply.

    Tariffs could force makers of generics to pull out of the US market altogether, says Tom Kraus, vice president of government relations for the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) told Al Jazeera.

    “Imposing tariffs on medications and their ingredients could force generic drug manufacturers with already slim profit margins to drop out of the US market for a given medication, resulting in drug shortages for American patients,” Kraus said.

    About 90 percent of the medications prescribed in US pharmacies are generic or biosimilar (meaning ingredients that have similar effects), according to a report from the Association of Accessible Medicines published in February.

    “It will cause a lot of reverberations throughout because someone’s going to have to pick up the tab. This will result in a smaller percentage of medication costs being covered by insurance companies, and thus this burden pushed to patients and consumers,” Lee added.

    Americans are already struggling to meet the costs of healthcare as it is. One in three Americans say they cannot take medications they are prescribed because of the cost, and 11 percent of Americans say they cannot meet their healthcare costs, with a higher burden on Hispanic adults at 18 percent overall.

    The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 7.7 percent of Americans are uninsured, meaning their medical costs are out of pocket. Even for those who do have insurance, public health experts believe that insurance premiums will increase if Trump moves ahead with pharmaceutical tariffs.

    “They’re going to spread that out among anyone paying insurance as a whole. That’s the whole concept of insurance,” Lee said.

    More expensive drugs are produced stateside or in Europe. Those could also get pricier. There is currently a 10 percent tariff in place impacting these drugs but that could go higher when country-specific tariffs, currently on pause, kick in.

    Drugs that come out of Europe are more often the blockbuster brand-name medications. Zepbound, Eli Lilly’s weight loss medication, for instance, is made in Ireland. If tariffs kick in there, out-of-pocket costs for US patients on Zepbound could run as much as $1,086.37 for a one-month supply, in contrast to as low as $25 with insurance.

    Supply chain strain
    In February, the American Hospital Association (AHA), in a letter calling for tariff exceptions for pharmaceuticals, said it is worried that the levies would make existing supply chain strains worse.

    “Despite ongoing efforts to build the domestic supply chain, the US healthcare system relies significantly on international sources for many drugs and devices needed to both care for patients and protect our healthcare workers. Tariffs, as well as any reaction of the countries on whom such tariffs are imposed, could reduce the availability of these life-saving medications and supplies in the US,” the trade group said in a letter to the White House. “US providers import many cancer and cardiovascular medications, immunosuppressives, antibiotics and combination antibiotics from China. For many patients, even a temporary disruption in their access to these needed medications could put them at significant risk of harm, including death.”

    The AHA declined Al Jazeera’s request for additional comment.

    “Healthcare has a very elaborate logistics chain, and obviously, it varies from product to product, but some of them are very complicated,” Abrams of Numerof and Associates added.

    For instance, some APIs undergo two or three different processes and not all of them are in the same place before they even come to the US to be incorporated into the final product, he explained.

    “When you take all these relationships and throw them up in the air and see how they come down, inevitably it leads to disruption in supply,” he continued.

    There are more than 104 active drug shortages in the United States, including common antibiotics like amoxicillin. China is one of the world’s three biggest exporters of the drug, and the US is the largest importer.

    Another concern about the US’s extreme reliance on China is that the country’s API market is only expected to grow by 7.8 percent over the next five years, according to the market research firm Modor Intelligence.

    Washington’s call for action
    During the Covid-19 pandemic, when trade essentially halted temporarily, there were concerns that the US did not have enough medications in its strategic reserve to handle a temporary halt. Both Republicans, such as Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton and Democrats, such as former President Joe Biden have long called for less reliance on China for pharmaceuticals as a result.

    “When you have supply chains that are not well diversified or dependent on just particular channels, then that supply chain is fragile and there’s risk,” Lee said.

    There have long been suggestions from prominent Chinese voices, including economist Li Daokui, that have called on leadership in Beijing to reduce antibiotic exports to the US as a tool in a trade war.

    But experts agree that Trump’s rapid approach does not give companies time to prepare and thus is putting patients at risk.

    The ASHP told the White House in a February letter that tariffs “should be applied selectively and dovetail with other incentives to increase domestic production and promote a stable supply chain”.

    “You can’t do it in the 18 months that you’re trying to get it done, OK? And it’s not even exactly a four-year undertaking either,” Abrams added.

    Some companies have said they will bring more pharmaceutical manufacturing jobs stateside. Swiss pharmaceutical giant Roche announced a $50bn investment in the US over the next five years, which will include funds to build research and development facilities and expand existing manufacturing operations.

    Roche follows Novartis, which announced that it would invest $23bn over the next five years to expand its US infrastructure. That includes thousands of new jobs in seven facilities that will manufacture drugs and APIs.

    But building and getting plants like these in production will not solve the immediate issue, according to ASHP.

    “It is important to note that building new pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity will take several years. In the meantime, tariffs risk higher prices for those drugs that can pass increased costs to consumers, and shortages for generic drugs that can’t,” Kraus of ASHP continued. Al Jazeera

  • For acquiring and setup of MRI machines in hospitals, Delhi will issue tenders

    For acquiring and setup of MRI machines in hospitals, Delhi will issue tenders

    To address the acute shortage of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) machines in Delhi’s 36 government hospitals — a gap that often pushes patients toward expensive private diagnostics — Delhi health minister Pankaj Singh said on Wednesday that a proposal to roll out MRI services across all state-run hospitals will be placed before the cabinet on Thursday.

    If cleared, the health department will float tenders for procurement and installation of MRI machines, enabling patients to access the crucial scans free of charge.

    Around 20 hospitals are expected to receive the machines in the first phase. More details will be shared following the cabinet’s approval, the Delhi health minister said.

    “We have prepared a proposal to introduce MRI machines in government hospitals. Once approved, tenders will be issued for procurement and installation,” Singh said.

    Senior officials at Delhi government’s health department confirmed the plan, and said it aims to reduce the out-of-pocket expenses for patients on diagnostic tests.

    Currently, only three government hospitals — including Lok Nayak, GB Pant, and Indira Gandhi Hospital — are equipped with MRI machines, according to health department officials.

    At present, the wait time at these hospitals for an MRI scan can range from anywhere from 30 days to six months.

    At GB Pant hospital, it can take a month or two for patients to get an MRI scan done, officials at the hospital, on condition of anonymity said. At Lok Nayak hospital, the situation is worse. Only if it is a life threatening situation that the hospital gets an MRI done on an urgent basis, which too might take a week. “But, in elective cases, the wait time can be six months to one year,” an official at the hospital said, asking not to be named.

    MRI scans, an essential diagnostic test that relies on strong magnetic fields and radio waves to produce detailed internal images, cost upwards of ₹5,000 in private diagnostic centres. But at government hospitals, where available, the scans are offered for free.

    “MRI scans are vital for diagnosing cardiac, neurological, and orthopedic conditions. On average, we receive 25–30 MRI cases daily,” said a senior doctor from GB Pant Hospital’s cardiology department.

    An RTI (Right to Information) query filed by activist Aman Kausik in February 2025 revealed that major hospitals — including Delhi State Cancer Institute, Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital, GTB Hospital, Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences, Baba Saheb Ambedkar Hospital, Guru Gobind Singh Hospital, and Lal Bahadur Shastri Hospital — lack MRI facilities altogether.

    In the absence of in-house MRI services, patients are either referred to private diagnostic centres or covered under the Delhi Arogya Kosh (DAK) scheme, which offers free scans to eligible residents with a family income of up to ₹3 lakh.

    “We receive at least 20–30 patients daily for CT scans, and even for that, we have only one machine. MRI, being a more advanced diagnostic tool, isn’t available at our hospital. So we either refer patients through the DAK scheme or advise them to approach private centres,” said an official from GTB Hospital.

    Similar constraints were reported at the Delhi State Cancer Institute and several other institutions.“A significant number of patients we see either do not reside in Delhi or are ineligible under the DAK scheme. In such cases, we’re unable to refer them for subsidised scans and often have to direct them to private diagnostic centres,” said an official from the Delhi State Cancer Institute, requesting anonymity. Hindustan Times