Blog

  • FDA sets new criteria to get annual COVID shots

    FDA sets new criteria to get annual COVID shots

    The Trump administration said Tuesday it will limit approval for seasonal Covid-19 shots to seniors and others at high risk pending more data on everyone else — raising questions about whether some people who want a vaccine this fall will be able to get one.

    Top officials for the Food and Drug Administration laid out new standards for updated Covid shots, saying they’d continue to use a streamlined approach to make them available to adults 65 and older as well as children and younger adults with at least one high-risk health problem.

    But the FDA framework, published Tuesday in the New England Journal of Medicine, urges companies to conduct large, lengthy studies before tweaked vaccines can be approved for healthier people. It’s a stark break from the previous federal policy recommending an annual Covid shot for all Americans six months and older. In the paper and a subsequent online webcast, the FDA’s top vaccine official said more than 100 million Americans still should qualify for what he termed a booster under the new guidance.

    Dr Vinay Prasad described the new approach as a “reasonable compromise” that will allow vaccinations in high-risk groups to continue while generating new data about whether they still benefit healthier people.

    “For many Americans we simply do not know the answer as to whether or not they should be getting the seventh or eighth or ninth or tenth Covid-19 booster,” said Prasad, who joined the FDA earlier this month. He previously spent more than a decade in academia, frequently criticizing the FDA’s handling of drug and vaccine approvals.

    It’s unclear what the upcoming changes mean for people who may still want a fall Covid-19 shot but don’t clearly fit into one of the categories.

    “Is the pharmacist going to determine if you’re in a high-risk group?” asked Dr Paul Offit, a vaccine expert at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. “The only thing that can come of this will make vaccines less insurable and less available.”

    The nation’s leading pediatrics group said FDA’s approach will limit options for parents and their children.

    “If the vaccine were no longer available or covered by insurance, it will take the choice away from families who wish to protect their children from Covid-19, especially among families already facing barriers to care,” said Dr Sean O’Leary of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

    Provisional data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows more than 47,000 Americans died from Covid-related causes last year. The virus was the underlying cause for two-thirds of those and it was a contributing factor for the rest. Among them were 231 children whose deaths were deemed Covid-related, 134 of them where the virus was the direct cause — numbers similar to yearly pediatric deaths from the flu.

    The new FDA approach is the culmination of a series of recent steps under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. scrutinizing the use of Covid shots and raising questions about the broader availability of vaccines. It was released two days ahead of the first meeting of FDA’s outside vaccine experts under Trump.

    Last week the FDA granted full approval of Novavax’s Covid-19 vaccine but with major restrictions on who can get it — and Tuesday’s guidance mirrors those restrictions. The approval came after Trump appointees overruled FDA scientists’ earlier plans to approve the shot without restrictions.

    Pfizer and Moderna, makers of the most commonly used Covid shots, each said they would continue to work with the agency.

    For years, federal health officials have told most Americans to expect annual updates to Covid-19 vaccines, similar to the annual flu shot. Just like with flu vaccines, until now the FDA has approved updated Covid shots so long as they show as much immune protection as the previous year’s version.

    But FDA’s new guidance appears to be the end of that approach, according to Prasad and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, who co-authored the journal paper and joined the FDA webcast.

    Prasad and Makary criticized the U.S.’s “one-size-fits-all,” contrasting it with some European countries that recommend boosters based on age, risk and other factors.

    Prasad said the FDA will ask all manufacturers to do new clinical trials in healthy people ages 50 to 64, randomly assigning them to get a vaccine or a placebo and tracking outcomes with special attention to severe disease, hospitalization or death. Companies might need to repeat that requirement for future vaccine approvals if there’s a large virus mutation rather than the past year’s incremental evolution. Companies are also free to test their vaccines for approval in younger adults and children, Prasad said, adding “this is a free country.”

    Since becoming the nation’s top health official in February, Kennedy has filled the FDA and other health agencies with outspoken critics of the government’s handling of Covid shots, including Makary and Prasad. Under federal procedures, the FDA releases new guidance in draft form and allows the public to comment before finalizing its plans. The publication of Tuesday’s policy in a medical journal is highly unusual and could run afoul of federal procedures, according to FDA experts.

    Health experts say there are legitimate questions about how much everyone still benefits from yearly Covid vaccination or whether they should be recommended only for people at increased risk.

    In June, an influential panel of advisers to the CDC is set to debate which vaccines should be recommended to which groups.

    The FDA’s announcement appears to usurp that advisory panel’s job, Offit said. He added that CDC studies have made clear that booster doses do offer protection against mild to moderate illness for four to six months after the shot even in healthy people. The Associated Press

  • Bengaluru gets pitched as Karnataka’s potential global MVT hub

    Bengaluru gets pitched as Karnataka’s potential global MVT hub

    With India fast emerging as a leading destination for global healthcare seekers, Bengaluru is positioning itself as a future global hub for medical tourism, said Dr Sharan Prakash Patil, Karnataka’s Minister of Medical Education, at the inauguration ceremony of SPARSH Group of Hospitals’ new 300-bed quaternary care facility at Hennur Road.

    The event marked a significant leap in the city’s medical infrastructure and reinforced Karnataka’s vision of healthcare leadership.

    The hospital was inaugurated by Shri Dinesh Gundu Rao, Minister of Health and Family Welfare, Government of Karnataka, in the presence of key dignitaries, including Jagadguru Shri Shivarathri Deshikendra Mahaswami of Suttur Math, Shri SS Mallikarjun, Minister of Mines & Geology and Horticulture, Shri Basavaraj Bommai, MP and Former Chief Minister, Justice Shivaraj V Patil, Former Supreme Court Judge, Dr Shamanur Shivashankarappa, MLA, and Shri BA Basavaraja, MLA, KR Puram.

    “The world is looking at India—and Karnataka—as a healthcare destination,” said Dr Sharan Prakash Patil. “Our doctors are globally respected for their expertise and ethics. With Bengaluru’s technological ecosystem and the rise of cutting-edge facilities like SPARSH Hennur, we are creating the ideal environment for medical innovation and global patient care. We’re also working to establish platforms to attract international patients and create a robust medical tourism ecosystem.”

    He added that Karnataka now has the highest number of medical seats in India, even ahead of Tamil Nadu, and is investing heavily in super-speciality hospitals and cancer centres across the state.

    Karnataka Health Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao, who inaugurated SPARSH Hospital on Hennur Road said, “Karnataka needs more hospitals and greater investment in the healthcare sector—not just in numbers, but in the quality of care we deliver. The focus must be on advanced, patient-centric services that can truly save lives. We are now seeing super-speciality services becoming a reality even in government hospitals, which is a big step forward.

    “What’s encouraging is that cutting-edge technologies—like robotics, artificial intelligence, and next-generation medical equipment—are no longer confined to private institutions or big cities. With time, these technologies become more affordable and accessible, and that’s a huge advantage for public health. We must wholeheartedly welcome such innovations and continue to support the growth of world-class healthcare infrastructure across both public and private sectors,” he added.

    The new SPARSH Hospital at Hennur Road is designed as a state-of-the-art quaternary care centre, offering specialities in orthopaedics, neurosciences, cardiac sciences, oncology, organ transplants, and a dedicated Women & Children’s Centre. The facility integrates robotic-assisted surgeries, AI-based diagnostics, 3D printing, and real-time analytics, offering a fusion of clinical excellence and digital innovation.

    Speaking on the occasion, Dr Sharan Shivaraj Patil, Chairman of SPARSH Group of Hospitals, emphasised the deeply personal vision behind this expansion. He said, “Hennur is a growing neighbourhood that lacked access to high-end healthcare. “My own experience navigating my father’s cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic made me realise how difficult it can be—even for those in the field—to bring everything together. That journey inspired me to make high-quality cancer treatment accessible to every family. SPARSH Hennur is our first dedicated step into cancer care, and we aim to extend the same excellence to every patient.”

    Beyond medical care, the facility is expected to generate over 2,500 direct and indirect jobs, strengthening the region’s economy. Built with patient-centric design and research-focused infrastructure, SPARSH Hennur also aims to become a hub for academic medicine and clinical innovation. The Statesman

  • OTT platforms aren’t viable, per EY-FICCI Report

    OTT platforms aren’t viable, per EY-FICCI Report

    Premium content on Over-the-Top (OTT) platforms declined by 12 percent in 2024, as streaming services scaled back high-cost productions in an effort to achieve profitability, according to the latest EY-FICCI report on India’s media and entertainment sector.

    Premium OTT Content Sees Double-Digit Decline
    The report highlighted that cost pressures are likely to intensify in 2025, as Pay TV households continue to decline and platforms struggle to manage their business models sustainably. While content volumes on OTT platforms are projected to rise in the coming year, they will likely come at a reduced average cost of production, reflecting a shift towards cost-efficient content strategies.

    “2024 saw a 12 percent fall in premium OTT content, and 2025 is expected to see significant pressure on costs as well, as Pay TV homes continue to decline, and OTT platforms struggle for profitability,” the report said.

    It added, “In 2025, we expect OTT content volumes to increase, but at a lower average cost of production.”

    Theatrical Releases Still Preferred
    In 2024, only 60 films were released directly on OTT platforms, even though around 500 titles eventually made their way to digital streaming. This trend suggests a continued preference among filmmakers for theatrical releases before moving to digital platforms.

    The report noted that OTT platforms are increasingly focusing on efficiency over scale, leading to tighter content budgets. Regional language content continued to gain prominence, with 48 percent of all OTT releases in 2024 featuring regional languages, either originally produced or through dubbed and subtitled formats aimed at wider audience reach.

    The Indian film industry showed slight signs of recovery, with more than 1,600 films released during the year, excluding 200 dubbed versions. This marks an increase of 64 titles over 2023, indicating gradual stabilisation post-pandemic.

    According to the report, television remained a dominant medium in terms of content consumption, with General Entertainment Channels (GECs) contributing 65 percent of total TV viewing hours in 2024, excluding news programming.

    Television Remains a Dominant Medium
    The report also pointed to an outlook for video consumption in India, underpinned by expanding digital infrastructure. By 2030, the number of large screens (such as smart TVs) is expected to surpass 200 million, while small screens, including smartphones, are projected to reach nearly 700 million.

    Driven by increasing per capita income, higher smart TV penetration, and affordable broadband, the number of subscribing OTT households is projected to grow from 47 million in 2024 to over 65 million by 2027. TelecomTalk

  • Charter will buy Cox for $21.9B in a huge cable merger

    Charter will buy Cox for $21.9B in a huge cable merger

    Charter Communications on Friday agreed to buy privately held rival Cox Communications for $21.9 billion, combining two of the largest U.S. cable and broadband operators in their battle with streaming giants and mobile carriers.

    The deal – one of the biggest globally this year – will bolster Charter’s push to bundle broadband and mobile services at a time when wireless carriers are luring internet customers with aggressive plans, while millions ditch traditional pay-TV for streaming services.

    Analysts have said Charter’s strategy of combining internet, TV and mobile services into a single, customizable package has shown merit, but it needs scale as cable firms rely on leasing network access from major carriers to offer mobile plans. Charter leases wireless network capacity from Verizon.

    “This combination will augment our ability to innovate and provide high-quality, competitively priced products,” said Charter CEO Chris Winfrey, who will head the combined company.

    The merger will be among the first major tests of M&A regulation under the Trump administration, as it would create the largest U.S. cable TV and broadband provider with around 38 million subscribers, surpassing market leader Comcast.

    U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar, a Democrat from Minnesota on the Senate antitrust committee, said a review of the deal needs to “make sure this proposed merger does not harm consumers by adversely affecting competition or stifling innovation in cable and broadband markets.”

    “Telecommunications services are essential to our economy, and I urge our antitrust enforcers to take an in-depth look at this merger to ensure it will not raise prices or create additional barriers to internet access,” she said.

    It will likely be reviewed by the U.S. Department of Justice’s antitrust division. Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater, who leads the division, has made it clear she intends to focus on mergers that decrease competition in ways that harm consumers or workers.

    “There is likely no significant direct competition between the two compared to the overall footprint so that should mitigate a lot of the competition concerns,” said Andre Barlow, an antitrust lawyer in Washington.

    The DOJ will look instead at whether the merged company will have leverage over rivals, he said. The DOJ did so in 2016 when it cleared Charter’s acquisition of Time Warner Cable on the condition that the company not restrict programming providers from entering distribution deals with streaming services.

    In a move some analysts saw as an attempt to bolster the deal’s antitrust appeal, Winfrey said the combined company would bring Cox’s customer service jobs back from overseas, but he did not specify how many. Charter’s customer service teams are already based entirely in the U.S.

    “Antitrust concerns are legitimate. But in this era of deregulation, the merger would probably pass as long as they don’t upset the president,” said Emarketer analyst Ross Benes.

    Synergies
    The companies said they expect to realize $500 million in cost savings within three years of the deal’s expected close in mid-2026.

    Under the cash-and-stock deal, Charter will take on about $12.6 billion of Cox’s net debt and other obligations, giving the transaction an enterprise value of $34.5 billion.

    Cox Enterprises, the family-owned parent of Cox Communications, will own about 23% of the merged entity, with its CEO Alex Taylor serving as chairman.

    The combination with Charter will also allow Cox to become a part of a broader platform and offer more competitive offerings to their customers, said the source close to Cox’s thinking. The combined firm will rebrand as Cox Communications within a year of the deal’s close, with Charter’s Spectrum being the consumer-facing brand. It will keep its headquarters in Stamford, Connecticut, while maintaining a big presence at Cox’s campus in Atlanta, Georgia.

    Charter and Cox had also discussed a merger in 2013 before shelving the plan, according to media reports. The talks between the two cable providers had picked up and cooled off several times since then, according to a source close to the deal. This time, Charter had begun discussions with Cox in January, with the formal offer from Charter following within a month after the beginning of the discussions, the source said.

    Cable billionaire John Malone said in November Charter should be allowed to merge with rivals such as Cox, shortly after Charter agreed to buy his Liberty Broadband.

    Liberty Broadband shareholders will receive direct interest in Charter under the terms of the deal with Cox.

    Citi and LionTree served as financial advisors to Charter, with Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz providing legal counsel. Cox Enterprises was advised by Allen & Company, while BDT & MSD Partners, Evercore, and Wells Fargo advised Cox Communications. Latham & Watkins served as legal counsel to Cox Enterprises. Reuters

  • No threat to Indian telcos from Starlink, Axis Capital

    No threat to Indian telcos from Starlink, Axis Capital

    Axis Capital believes Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite-based internet service poses no threat to existing telecom operators as it is likely to enter the Indian market as a highly premium offering.

    Gaurav Malhotra, Executive Director at Axis Capital, noted that Starlink’s average revenue per user (ARPU) globally ranges between $25 to $30, compared to $4–$5 for mobile operators in India even after recent tariff hikes.

    Broadband ARPU in India stands at around $7–$8, while Starlink’s plans may go up to $40 in some countries.

    He also pointed out that while home routers in India are typically provided for free with a security deposit of ₹2,000–2,500, Starlink’s terminal costs range from ₹25,000 to ₹30,000.

    Given the high pricing and premium positioning, he indicated there is little concern for telecom operators in the foreseeable future.

    Axis Capital maintains a positive view on Reliance Industries, highlighting its recovery after last year’s underperformance and its potential to sustain outperformance going forward.

    In the telecom sector, the brokerage remains neutral on Indus Towers due to ongoing uncertainties around Vodafone Idea. While the stock appears inexpensive and offers potential dividends, Axis Capital prefers to stay cautious for now.

    As for Bharti Airtel, the next key trigger is expected to be a tariff hike.

    Previous hikes led to strong ARPU transmission—98–100% for Bharti and around 90% for Jio—indicating that even a modest increase could support steady ARPU growth.

    The last hike took place in June 2024, and the firm expects the next one between December 2025 and June 2026. Over the next three years, ARPU is projected to grow at a CAGR of 9-10%, driven by both tariff hikes and a shift toward premium offerings. CNBCTV18

  • The major themes driving the cloud’s future

    The major themes driving the cloud’s future

    Gartner, Inc. has announced the top trends shaping the future of cloud adoption over the next four years. These include cloud dissatisfaction, AI/machine learning (ML), multicloud, sustainability, digital sovereignty and industry solutions.

    Joe Rogus, Director, Advisory at Gartner, said, “These trends are accelerating the shift in how cloud is transforming from a technology enabler to a business disruptor and necessity for most organizations. Over the next few years, cloud will continue to unlock new business models, competitive advantages and ways of achieving business missions.”

    According to Gartner, the following six trends will shape the future of cloud, ultimately resulting in new ways of working that are digital in nature and transformative in impact.

    Trend 1: Cloud Dissatisfaction
    Cloud adoption continues to grow, but not all implementations succeed. Gartner predicts 25% of organizations will have experienced significant dissatisfaction with their cloud adoption by 2028, due to unrealistic expectations, suboptimal implementation and/or uncontrolled costs.

    To remain competitive, enterprises need a clear cloud strategy and effective execution. Gartner research indicates that those that have successfully addressed upfront strategic focus by 2029 will find their cloud dissatisfaction will decrease.

    Trend 2: AI/ML Demand Increases
    Demand for AI/ML is set to surge, with hyperscalers positioned at the core of this growth. They will drive a shift in how compute resources are allocated by embedding foundational capabilities into their IT infrastructure, facilitating partnerships with vendors and users, and leveraging real and synthetic data to train AI models. Gartner predicts 50% of cloud compute resources will be devoted to AI workloads by 2029, up from less than 10% today.

    “This all points to a fivefold increase in AI-related cloud workloads by 2029,” said Rogus “Now is the time for organizations to assess whether their data centers and cloud strategies are ready to handle this surge in AI & ML demand. In many cases, they might need to bring AI to where the data is to support this growth.”

    Trend 3: Multicloud and Cross Cloud
    Many organizations that have adopted multicloud architecture find connecting to and between providers a challenge. This lack of interoperability between environments can slow cloud adoption, with Gartner predicting more than 50% of organizations will not get the expected results from their multicloud implementations by 2029.

    Gartner recommends identifying specific use cases and planning for distributed apps and data in the organization that could benefit from a cross-cloud deployment model. This enables workloads to operate collaboratively across different cloud platforms, as well as different on-premises and colocation facilities.

    Trend 4: Industry Solutions
    There is an upward trend toward industry-specific cloud platforms, with more vendors offering solutions that address vertical business outcomes and help scale digital initiatives. Over 50% of organizations will use industry cloud platforms to accelerate their business initiatives by 2029, according to Gartner.

    Gartner recommends organizations approach industry cloud platforms as a strategic way to add new capabilities to their broader IT portfolio, rather than a total replacement. This allows organizations to avoid technical debt, drive innovation and business value.

    Trend 5: Digital Sovereignty
    AI adoption, tightening privacy regulations and geopolitical tensions are driving demand for sovereign cloud services. Organizations will be increasingly required to protect data, infrastructure and critical workloads from control by external jurisdictions and foreign government access. Gartner predicts over 50% of multinational organizations will have digital sovereign strategies by 2029, up from less than 10% today.

    “As organizations proactively align their cloud strategies to address digital sovereignty requirements, there are already a wide range of offerings that will support them,” said Rogus. “However, it’s important they understand exactly what their requirements are, so they can select the right mix of solutions to safeguard their data and operational integrity.”

    Trend 6: Sustainability
    Cloud providers and users are increasingly sharing responsibility for sustainable IT infrastructure. This is being driven by regulators, investors and public demand for greater alignment between technology investments and environmental goals. As AI workloads demand more energy, organizations are also under pressure to better understand, measure and manage the sustainability implications of emerging cloud technologies.

    Gartner research shows the percentage of global organizations prioritizing sustainability as part of procurement will rise to over 50% by 2029. To deliver greater value from cloud investments, organizations must look beyond environmental impact alone and align their sustainability strategies with key business outcomes. Gartner

  • Trump’s Middle East AI deals provoke conflict in the admin

    Trump’s Middle East AI deals provoke conflict in the admin

    President Donald Trump’s flurry of artificial intelligence deals during his tour of the Middle East is opening a rift within his own administration as China hawks grow increasingly concerned the projects are putting US national security and economic interests at risk.

    The Trump team has worked out agreements for parties in Saudi Arabia to acquire tens of thousands of semiconductors from Nvidia Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc., while shipments to the United Arab Emirates could top a million accelerators — mostly for projects involving or owned by US companies. Such chips are used to develop and train models that can mimic human intelligence, and they’re the most coveted technology of the AI age.

    Some senior administration officials are seeking to slow down the deals over concerns the US hasn’t imposed sufficient guardrails to prevent American chips shipped to the Gulf from ultimately benefiting China, which has deep ties in the region, according to people familiar with the matter. While the UAE and Saudi accords include high-level language barring Chinese firms from accessing those chips, these officials argue too many details are still unresolved and the deals shouldn’t be announced without legally binding provisions, the people said.

    China hawks also have grown alarmed over what they see as a willingness by White House AI Adviser David Sacks, who’s helping lead the talks, to entertain proposals from Gulf leaders that they view as clear national security risks. None of those proposals are included in the current bilateral accords in the Middle East.

    Beyond those security issues, some senior Trump officials question the wisdom of shipping such large quantities of chips to any location outside the US, given the administration’s focus on maintaining American dominance in AI, said the people. As Vice President JD Vance put it at a Paris AI summit in February, “the Trump administration will ensure that the most powerful AI systems are built in the US with American designed and manufactured chips.”

    If the announced and planned Middle East deals all come to fruition, the US would still hold the vast majority of the world’s computing power — but Gulf countries would for the first time have significant capabilities powered by best-in-class US hardware.

    A representative for the White House didn’t provide official comment for this story, which is based on interviews with nearly a dozen people who spoke about internal administration discussions on condition of anonymity. Nvidia and a spokesperson for the UAE declined to comment, while Sacks, AMD and the Saudi Arabian government didn’t respond to requests for comment.

    Advocates for the deals, including Sacks, argue that if the US doesn’t encourage the world to use American chips, countries with AI ambitions will eventually turn to alternatives from Chinese companies — which have made progress in closing the gap with Nvidia, the industry leader.

    “We need our friends, like the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and other strategic partners and allies, to want to build on our tech,” Sacks said Tuesday while on stage with Saudi Arabia’s minister of communications and information technology. The possibility of that tech winding up in China is “not an issue with a friend like Saudi Arabia at all,” he said.

    Not everyone in the Trump administration agrees. In escalating conversations over the past two days, several senior officials have discussed strategies for slowing the implementation of Gulf AI agreements — and pumping the brakes on projects that have yet to be unveiled, the people said. One concern is a bilateral accord between the US and UAE that could include a massive project by OpenAI, the industry pioneer behind ChatGPT.

    Trump arrived in Abu Dhabi on Thursday after stops earlier this week in Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Officials on the ground were still in active negotiations the morning of the president’s visit, according to people familiar with the matter, who added that they expect the deals to move forward in the near term.

    If that happens, China hawks may press their concerns through the regulatory process in Washington. All AI chip shipments to the Gulf require US government approval through a licensing process involving several federal agencies. Administration officials are also in the middle of drafting global semiconductor export control rules after tossing out a framework introduced by President Joe Biden. That provides another opportunity to include specific China guardrails and other strategic priorities.

    Sacks, along with other officials who support the Gulf projects, has made the case that aggressive proliferation with security provisions would be a strategic win for the US — and crucial for maintaining American leadership in AI.

    Part of Sacks’ argument — echoed by tech leaders including Nvidia Chief Executive Officer Jensen Huang — is that the US lead over China in advanced chipmaking is shrinking. If Washington prevents countries with AI ambitions from building data centers with American technology, the logic goes, the US risks ceding those markets to its main geopolitical rival. Companies may choose to buy chips from the likes of Huawei Technologies Co., the Chinese tech giant at the center of Washington’s efforts to curtail Beijing’s AI ambitions.

    On the other side of the debate, some officials in both the Trump and Biden administrations have argued that America’s technological lead is quite large and enables Washington to write the rules of the road for as long as other countries still covet American chips. Policymakers can afford to be aggressive in negotiations, these officials argue, and shouldn’t allow countries to access best-in-class American hardware without concessions and ironclad security promises.

    Trump officials in this second camp think they may be losing the internal fight over Middle East chip shipments — especially after the UAE and Saudi Arabia offered a combined $2.4 trillion in US investments that helped pave the way for the recent AI deals. In particular, some senior administration officials have grown wary of negotiating positions adopted by Sacks, who has been one of the central players on the ground as government officials and tech executives hammer out the accords.

    In one meeting with Emirati officials ahead of Trump’s trip, Sacks expressed openness to the UAE housing a production facility from Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., the leading maker of chips for the likes of Nvidia and AMD, people familiar with the matter said. The UAE has long coveted such a plant and asked the US government for its support as part of the broader chip accord.

    The hawkish Trump officials view a possible TSMC plant in the UAE as dangerous, the people said. Supporting the UAE’s ambitions to manufacture AI chips domestically would create unnecessary national security risks given the country’s ties to Beijing, the officials argue, especially if political alliances change in the future. The current accord doesn’t include a TSMC plant, though separate conversations about such a project remain ongoing. TSMC declined to comment.

    Another lingering concern with the UAE is G42, the leading Abu Dhabi-based AI firm with historic ties to Huawei. Although it agreed to divest from Huawei and other Chinese providers to pave the way for a $1.5 billion partnership with Microsoft Corp. last year, some US officials remain wary of G42’s commitment to American priorities. Now the Trump administration is considering an agreement that would allow G42 to buy the equivalent of more than a million Nvidia H100 accelerators, among the chipmaker’s top offerings, Bloomberg has reported.

    Critics of that accord include the chairman of the House China Select Committee, which last year released a video detailing the bipartisan panel’s G42 concerns. The voiceover in that video comes from Landon Heid, Trump’s nominee for a top position at the agency that writes chip export rules and decides whether to approve individual semiconductor sales.

    Details of the security requirements in the broader UAE accord will be sorted out in a working group composed of American and Emirati officials, according to the people familiar with the matter. Topics already in the agreement include provisions to prevent diversion of chips to China and bar Chinese AI companies from remotely accessing UAE facilities. Sacks has been angling to steer efforts to write the fine print, the people said — something that several of his US counterparts oppose.

    At one point in negotiations with Saudi Arabia, Saudi officials suggested they may install US chips in facilities that contain Huawei hardware, the people said, adding that the hardware in question was not Huawei’s AI chips. The US delegation shot down that suggestion in the meeting, but after the fact, Sacks suggested that Trump’s team should at least evaluate the idea. While some officials understood Sacks’ reaction as a suggestion to consider national security concerns on a technical basis, others saw it as an immediate disregard for why US officials would hold those concerns in the first place.

    For officials who view Huawei as a red line in Washington’s China policy, the exploration of that possibility was unacceptable. The idea is not part of the current accord, people familiar with the matter said.

    “The policy objective of preventing diversion to countries of concern is an absolutely important objective of the United States but it is not a difficult one to achieve,” Sacks said during his Middle East appearance. “The truth of the matter is that all one would have to do is send someone to a data center and count the server racks to make sure the chips are still there.” Bloomberg

  • National safety risks lead US legislators to argue for TP-Link’s ban

    National safety risks lead US legislators to argue for TP-Link’s ban

    A group of US lawmakers and senators has urged Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick to ban the sale of TP-Link equipment in the nation, citing national security concerns. In a bicameral letter, the legislators allege that TP-Link maintains close ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), engages in predatory pricing practices to undercut American competitors, and may be embedding foreign surveillance and potentially harmful capabilities into US networks. They warn that the company poses a “clear and present danger” to the nation’s security infrastructure.

    “TP-Link is also subject to China’s National Security Law, which grants the Chinese Communist Party access to US systems—potentially even before American authorities are aware of vulnerabilities,” the lawmakers wrote. “Notably, TP-Link is the only router manufacturer that refuses to participate in industry efforts to remediate Chinese state-sponsored botnets.”

    The letter to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was signed by Senators John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, Tom Cotton, a Republican from Arkansas, Ted Budd, a Republican from North Carolina, Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana, Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, Jim Justice, a Republican from West Virginia, Cynthia Lummis, a Republican from Wyoming, Bernie Moreno, a Republcian from Ohio, Pete Ricketts, a Republican from Nebraska, James Risch, a Republican from Idaho, Eric Schmitt, a Republican from Missouri, Rick Scott,a Republican from Florida, and Tommy Tuberville, a Republican from Alabama.

    In the House, the letter was led by Congressman Riley Moore from West Virginia, and co-signed by Representatives Gus Bilirakis from Florida, Abraham Hamadeh from Arizona, and John Rose from Tennessee.

    The letter highlighted that Chinese state actors have exploited TP-Link small and home office (SOHO) networking devices, including Wi-Fi routers, cellular gateways, and mobile hotspots to wage cyber-attacks in the US CCP agents commonly exploit SOHO routers because those systems have ideal bandwidth and computing power for sustained cyber activities but lack additional layers of security common in enterprise networks.

    “TP-Link’s pricing practices have triggered a Department of Justice criminal antitrust probe. TP-Link’s predatory pricing, coupled with its circumvention of tariffs, imminently threatens US competition in a market critical to our national security,” according to the letter. “TP-Link has rapidly captured nearly 60 percent of the US retail router and Wi-Fi system market while expanding the CCP’s cyber arsenal. The CCP uses SOHO equipment for ongoing espionage and targeting of critical infrastructure to pre-position itself for destructive attacks on Americans and communication channels with our allies.”

    The lawmakers added, “For these reasons, Commerce should immediately prohibit future sales of TP-Link SOHO networking equipment in the United States. Each day we fail to act, the CCP wins while American competitors suffer, and American security remains at risk.”

    Earlier this month, in response to the growing wave of cyber threats targeting public infrastructure, Cotton and Senator Ruben Gallego, a Democrat from Arizona, introduced the Water Cybersecurity Enhancement Act, a bipartisan bill designed to strengthen the cybersecurity resilience of US water utilities.

    The Water Cybersecurity Enhancement Act would extend and expand the existing Drinking Water Infrastructure Risk and Resilience Program, strengthening its scope to address modern cyber threats. Additionally, the legislation would provide technical assistance and grants to community water systems, offering training and guidance to help them protect against and respond to cyberattacks.

    The legislation follows rising concern over cyberattacks by foreign adversaries, including Russia, China, and Iran, that have increasingly targeted municipal systems across the country. Often underfunded and lacking robust digital defenses, water utilities have become a prime target for malicious actors seeking to disrupt essential public services.

    The spotlight on TP-Link equipment underscores growing concerns over Chinese intrusions into US critical infrastructure. This week, a news report revealed that US energy officials are reassessing the risks associated with Chinese-made components in the renewable energy sector. Unexplained communication hardware was reportedly found in devices, such as power inverters, which are critical systems primarily manufactured in China that connect solar panels, wind turbines, batteries, heat pumps, and electric vehicle (EV) chargers to the power grid. Industrial Cyber

  • By 31%, the Trump admin reduces funds for cancer research

    By 31%, the Trump admin reduces funds for cancer research

    US President Donald Trump’s administration cut cancer research funding by 31 percent in the first three months of 2025 compared to the same period last year, according to a Senate report released Tuesday that accuses the White House of waging a “war on science.”

    The analysis, commissioned by the leftwing Senator Bernie Sanders, found that at least $13.5 billion in health funding had been terminated as of April, including 1,660 grants, while thousands of scientific staff were fired.

    Among the hardest hit was the National Cancer Institute, which lost more than $300 million from January to March compared to 2024, driving inflation-adjusted grant funding to its lowest level in over a decade. Its parent agency, the National Institutes of Health, lost $2.7 billion.

    “Since January, Trump has launched an unprecedented, illegal and outrageous attack on science and scientists,” said Sanders, the ranking member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee.

    “Trump is not only denying scientific truth but actively seeking to undermine it.”

    The Health and Human Services department, led by vaccine-skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr, hit back.

    “Senator Sanders’ claim of a ‘war on science’ is unequivocally false. The report released by his office today is a politically motivated distortion that undermines the thousands of dedicated public health professionals across HHS, who remain steadfast in their commitment to delivering results for the American people,” the department said on X.

    Under Kennedy’s leadership, “HHS is streamlining programs, eliminating redundancies, and — above all else — prioritizing gold standard science,” it added.

    ‘Complete chaos’ 
    The report, based on interviews with dozens of federal scientists and health workers, paints a picture of disarray across HHS.

    At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), at least 175 public health datasets were deleted, leaving doctors “without vetted guidance on how to treat patients,” one physician said.

    A 43-year-old colorectal cancer patient, already treated with surgery, radiation, and 48 rounds of chemotherapy, said her participation in a T-cell therapy trial at the NIH was delayed due to staff shortages.

    “The reality is that by reducing money and staff, the NIH will not be able to produce my treatment — and it might cost me my life,” she told Senate staff.

    At the NIH Clinical Center, researchers described “complete chaos” after entire labs were dismissed. “This administration has a lot of blood on their hands,” said one. “We just want to take care of people.”

    The report also highlighted the dangers of misinformation amid a growing measles outbreak, which has infected more than 1,000 people and killed three. Over 40 grants studying vaccine hesitancy have been canceled.

    Meanwhile, Kennedy has hired vaccine conspiracy theorist David Geier, previously disciplined for practicing medicine without a license and testing unproven drugs on autistic children, to investigate an alleged connection between vaccines and autism, debunked by dozens of prior studies.

    Even as Trump proposes a 26 percent cut to the HHS budget next year, he has earmarked $500 million for Kennedy’s “Make America Healthy Again” initiative, which targets nutrition, physical activity, and “over-reliance on medication.” AFP

  • US tariffs’ consequences for medical tourism

    US tariffs’ consequences for medical tourism

    US trade policy has seen notable changes recently, particularly with regard to import tariffs on countries such as China. Though these policies are usually justified by economic and geopolitical considerations, they also impact other areas, including the medical device industry and, more specifically, medical tourism. One growing outcome is how these tariffs are affecting medical tourism—the practice of traveling to another country to receive healthcare services. As medical expenses continue to climb in the US, a growing number of patients are looking overseas for more cost-effective treatment options, according to GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company.

    The US has imposed steep tariffs on a range of medical products imported from China, including syringes and needles, rubber medical and surgical gloves, and facemasks. These items are integral to a wide variety of medical procedures and daily healthcare operations. The imposition of tariffs on such goods has disrupted supply chains, constrained hospital procurement strategies, and driven up the cost of healthcare delivery across the US.

    In response to these rising costs, a growing number of Americans are turning to medical tourism. Popular destinations include Mexico, India, Thailand, and Costa Rica, which offer competitive pricing and internationally accredited healthcare facilities. For example, the average cost of a knee replacement surgery in the US can exceed $50,000, but the same procedure in India or Mexico can be performed for $8000-$12,000. As US healthcare providers face increased operational costs due to tariffs – especially on imported surgical instruments, diagnostic equipment, and protective gear – the price gap between domestic and international care continues to widen, creating a financial incentive for patients to consider treatment overseas.

    Alexandra Murdoch, Senior Medical Analyst at GlobalData, comments: “While the intended impact of tariffs may not have been to effect healthcare, they do shape patient behavior. The rise in the cost of medical devices ultimately leads to more out-of-pocket expenses for patients.”

    US tariffs on medical imports are reshaping not only international trade relationships but also domestic healthcare economics. The direct result is an increase in the cost of medical care, which disproportionately affects uninsured and underinsured populations. One of the most notable responses to these price pressures has been a rise in outbound medical tourism. Patients are seeking high-quality, affordable care in countries that are not impacted by these tariffs — a trend that is likely to continue if current trade and healthcare cost trajectories remain unchanged.

    Murdoch concludes: “This dynamic highlights a deeper connection between global trade policy and patient access to care. As the US continues to adjust its economic strategy, it will be important for policymakers and healthcare leaders to consider the downstream impacts on medical accessibility, affordability, and patient behavior.” GlobalData